|

List Price: $27.95
Our Price: $4.95
You Save: 82%

Product Details:
Type: Hardcover
Item#: C7353

submit a review
|
|
Who Charles Darwin really was -- and what's dead wrong (and dangerous) about his theory
The Darwin Myth: The Life and Lies of Charles Darwin
by Benjamin Wiker
We are still caught in the lie that Darwinism is the only
respectable scientific position -- and much of this
pseudoscientific dogmatism rests on myths surrounding the
enigmatic figure of Charles Darwin himself. Darwin would change
the world with his theory -- but the popular perception of him as
a disinterested scientist who arrived at this theory after
painstaking and meticulous examination of the natural world is
dead wrong. As Benjamin Wiker proves in The Darwin Myth: The
Life and Lies of Charles Darwin, Darwin did not originate the
theory of evolution. Darwin's singular achievement was to dress
it up with enough scientific trappings to make it plausible -- a
goal which he pursued out of a fanatical desire to strike a blow
at Christianity and eradicate the idea that human beings were
created in the image of God. Wiker shows that Darwinism, despite
the shrill denials of many of its supporters, does indeed lead
to atheism -- because Darwin designed it to do so.
(continued from above)
Wiker tells the whole story from Darwin's youth, tracing
the development of his thinking and the influence of his family
members who were already exploring evolution as an explanation
for the origin of life. He reveals what really happened during
Darwin’s celebrated voyage on the Beagle, demonstrating that
Darwin did not discover evidence of evolution on the Galapagos
Islands; traces the illnesses and tumult in the Darwin household
as Darwin and his wife wrestled with the relationship between
evolutionary theory and Christian faith; explains how Darwin’s
two most notorious and influential works, The Origin of Species
and The Descent of Man, are two parts of the same argument, with
the first laying out his argument for evolution through natural
selection, and the second applying the theory to human beings;
and much more.
Many have tried to make Darwin a secular saint, whose every
fault is politely left unmentioned or hastily excused. Some have
tried to make him a demon, and fiercely ignore his virtues. The
Darwin Myth portrays him as he really was. Its provocative
conclusion? "I have no doubt that if somehow Darwin could have
lived to see what became of Darwinism," says Wiker, "he would
have been absolutely mortified. But would Darwin have been
sufficiently shocked to question Darwinism itself?" Whether or
not he would have been, in The Darwin Myth Wiker gives you ample
ammunition to do just that, and to prevail over the mindless and
Darwin-inspired atheist dogma that surrounds us everywhere
today.
Beyond the myths, the truth about Darwin
and his pernicious theory:
- Charles Darwin's grandfather Erasmus: the bestselling
medical-zoological treatise he wrote that spelled out his
theory of evolution more than half a century before his
grandson Charles Darwin wrote On the Origin of Species
- How nothing in the childhood of Charles Darwin would have
appeared to indicate future greatness
- How Darwin represented his religious skepticism as the
result of scientific discovery rather than a family
inheritance -- but the facts were otherwise
- The voyage of the Beagle: why Darwin, the great homebody,
was about as unlikely a candidate for such an adventure as
one could find
- How Darwin the scientist not only categorized races but
placed them in an evolutionary order of inferior and
superior, with black and white being practically different
species
- Why the popular notion that Darwin wasn't really pondering
evolution as a theory on his voyage until he landed on the
Galapagos Islands is unsupportable
- The Galapagos Islands: how Darwin found unique variations
of creatures -- although at the time he observed them he
completely missed important distinctions among species, and
their significance, so that there was no grand evolutionary
aha! at Galapagos.
- Darwin's odd possessiveness about his theory of evolution --
leading him even to fail to acknowledge his predecessors,
including his own grandfather
- How Darwin's experience with the savage tribes of Tierra
del Fuego would play a major role in his theory of the
evolution of man -- leading him to rank races as belonging
to different gradations in the varying stages of evolution
- Darwin's racism: how he saw "the negro or Australian" as
intermediate species, less evolved from the ape, and hence
more likely to lose in the relentless struggle of the fit
against the unfit
- Darwin and slavery: how he found "the wonderful instinct of
making slaves" to be a natural fact
- How the evolution dilemma -- either a systematically
Godless account of evolution or a young-earth creationism
that sees every warbler and butterfly as being immediately
created by God -- is a false dichotomy popularized by
Darwinists to gain support for Darwin's theory
- The little-noted distinction between evolution and
Darwinism: how one can heartily accept evolution on
scientific grounds and roundly reject Darwinism on
scientific, philosophical, moral, and theological grounds
- The deep anti-theistic bias that Darwin built into his
theory -- and why those Christians who reject evolution
because they believe that it leads to atheism are indeed
proceeding from a proper fear
- How Darwin could not eliminate God from his theory without
also eliminating humanity, that is, reducing human beings
to mere animals
- Hitler and the Nazis: how Darwinism proved influential in
providing a scientific foundation for their racial and
eugenic theories
- How Darwin's theory actually makes racial extermination
central to human evolution and the engine of evolutionary
progress, for to condemn the slaughter of one tribe or race
by another is to condemn evolution itself
- Darwin's lies -- and how his worst lie was the one he told
himself, that he could have his moral cake and eat it too:
pushing a Godless account of evolution that made morality a
mere transient effect of natural selection, and at the same
time holding up particular moral traits, such as sympathy,
as if they were somehow the result of aimless evolution

|
|